From:	"Qian Wang" <xie.wang^-^gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:24:59 -0400
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?

From:	"Radoslaw Kaminski" <rkaminski_+_acid.ch.pw.edu.pl>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:53:52 +0200 (CEST)
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?

From:	"Damiano Portinari" <damiano,+,chem.gla.ac.uk>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:08:46 -0400
Subject:	CCL: acid-base reaction energy barrier

From:	"Close, David M." <CLOSED---mail.etsu.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:26:36 -0400
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?

From:	errol lewars <elewars!=!trentu.ca>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:10:13 -0400
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?

From:	Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke-x-bigpond.net.au>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:47:24 +1000
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?

From:	"Soren Eustis" <soren : jhu.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:55:00 -0400
Subject:	CCL: geometry optimization problem: why lower level geometry is more close to experimental results?