From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6d=F6n?= Farkas <farkas * chem.elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:11:17 +0100
Subject:	CCL:G: Constraints?

From:	"Mi Yang" <miyang3790-$-gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:46:43 -0500
Subject:	CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability

From:	"Vasile Chis" <vchis]-[phys.ubbcluj.ro>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:29:30 +0200
Subject:	CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability

From:	"Lukasz Cwiklik" <cwiklik() gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:03:31 +0200
Subject:	CCL: Ewald Sum

From:	<willsd__appstate.edu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:31:33 GMT
Subject:	CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability

From:	favaro <laurent.favaro++u-psud.fr>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:29:16 +0100
Subject:	CCL:G: Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability

From:	"Sobia Ahsan halim" <sobia_halim+/-yahoo.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:52:25 -0500
Subject:	CCL: How to define water molecules during docking?????????

From:	zborowsk#chemia.uj.edu.pl
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:13:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject:	CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability

From:	Jean-Christophe Poully <poully|galilee.univ-paris13.fr>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:10:26 +0100
Subject:	CCL: Conformational searches with right Ramachandran angles